|
Patel Faces Congressional Hearings 09/15 06:12
Patel approaches congressional oversight hearings this coming week facing
not just questions about that investigation but broader doubts about whether he
can stabilize a federal law enforcement agency fragmented by political fights
and internal upheaval.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Hours after the assassination of conservative activist
Charlie Kirk, FBI Director Kash Patel declared online that "the subject" in the
killing was in custody. The shooter was not. The two men who had been detained
were quickly released. Utah officials acknowledged that the gunman remained at
large.
The false assurance was more than a slip. It spotlighted the high-stakes
uncertainty surrounding Patel's leadership of the bureau when its credibility
is under extraordinary pressure, as is his own.
Patel now approaches congressional oversight hearings this coming week
facing not just questions about that investigation but broader doubts about
whether he can stabilize a federal law enforcement agency fragmented by
political fights and internal upheaval.
Democrats are poised to press Patel on a purge of senior executives that has
prompted a lawsuit, his pursuit of President Donald Trump's grievances long
after the Russia investigation ended, and a realignment of resources that has
prioritized the fight against illegal immigration and street crime.
The hearings will offer Patel his most consequential stage yet, and perhaps
the clearest test of whether he can convince the country that the FBI, under
his watch, can avoid compounding its mistakes in a time of political violence
and deepening distrust.
"Because of the skepticism that some members of the Senate have had and
still have, it's extremely important that he perform very well at these
oversight hearings" on Tuesday and Wednesday, said Gregory Brower, the FBI's
former top congressional affairs official.
The FBI declined to comment about Patel's coming testimony.
He claimed the subject was 'in custody'
Kirk's killing was always going to be a closely scrutinized investigation,
not only because it was the latest burst of political violence inside the
United States but also because of Kirk's friendships with Trump, Patel and
other administration figures and allies.
While agents investigated, Patel posted on X that "the subject for the
horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody."
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said at a near-contemporaneous news conference that
"Whoever did this, we will find you," suggesting authorities were still
searching. Patel soon after posted that the person in custody had been released.
As the search stretched on, Patel angrily vented to FBI personnel Thursday
about what he perceived as a failure to keep him informed, including that he
was not quickly shown a photograph of the suspected shooter. That's according
to people familiar with the matter who were not authorized to discuss it by
name and spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press. The New York
Times earlier reported details of the call.
Asked about the scrutiny of Patel's performance, the FBI said it had worked
with local law enforcement to bring the suspect, Tyler Robinson, to justice and
"will continue to be transparent."
Patel's overall response did not go unnoticed in conservative circles. One
prominent strategist, Christopher Rufo, posted that it was "time for
Republicans to assess whether Kash Patel is the right man to run the FBI."
Then there's the personnel purge
On the same day Kirk was killed, Patel also faced a lawsuit from three FBI
senior executives fired in an August purge that they characterized as a Trump
administration retribution campaign.
Among them was Brian Driscoll, who as acting FBI director in the early days
of the Trump administration resisted Justice Department demands for names of
agents who investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol. Driscoll alleged
in the lawsuit that he was let go after he challenged the leadership's desire
to terminate an FBI pilot who had been wrongly identified on social media as
having been part of the FBI search for classified at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.
The upheaval continues a trend that began before Patel took over, when more
than a half-dozen senior executives were forced out under a Justice Department
rationale that they could not be "trusted" to implement Trump's agenda.
There's since been significant turnover in leadership at the FBI's 55 field
offices. Some left because of promotions or retirements, but others because of
ultimatums to accept new assignments or resign. The head of the Salt Lake City
office, an experienced counterterrorism investigator, was pushed out of her
position weeks before Kirk was killed at a Utah college, said people familiar
with the move.
FBI's priorities shift under Patel
Patel arrived at the FBI having been a sharp critic of its leadership,
including for inquiries into Trump that he says politicized the institution.
Under Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi, the FBI and Justice Department have
become entangled in their own politically fraught investigations, such as the
one into New York Attorney General Letitia James.
He's moved quickly to remake the bureau, with the FBI and Justice Department
working to investigate one of the Republican president's chief grievances --
the years-old Trump-Russia investigation. Trump calls that probe, which did not
establish a criminal conspiracy between Russia and Trump's campaign, a "hoax."
The Justice Department appeared to confirm in an unusual statement that it
was investigating former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John
Brennan, pivotal players in the Russia saga but did not say for what. Bondi has
directed that evidence be presented to a grand jury.
Critics of the fresh Russia inquiry consider it a transparent attempt to
turn the page from the fierce backlash the FBI and Justice Department endured
fromTrump's base following their July announcement that they would not be
releasing any additional documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking
investigation.
Patel has meanwhile elevated the fight against street crime, drug
trafficking and illegal immigration to the top of the FBI's agenda, in
alignment with Trump's agenda.
The bureau makes no apologies for aggressive policing in American cities the
Trump administration contends have been consumed by crime. Patel says the
thousands of resulting arrests, many immigration-related, are "what happens
when you let good cops be good cops."
But some are concerned the street crime focus could draw attention from the
sophisticated public corruption and national security threats for which the
bureau has long been primarily, if not solely, responsible for investigating.
|
|