- DTN Headline News
More Fertilizer Volatility?
By Russ Quinn
Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:22PM CST

OMAHA (DTN) -- A Russian invasion of Ukraine will most certainly affect the global fertilizer market, but to what extent is not known. Several factors, including what sanctions Russia would see and if those sanctions included crop nutrients, would dictate how fertilizers are affected.

We do know a conflict in the Black Sea region would probably lower the prospects of less-expensive fertilizer prices for U.S. farmers in 2022, according to fertilizer analysts.


It took less than 30 days into the New Year for the global fertilizer market to see yet another potential dramatic world event that could affect nutrient supplies and thus prices.

This comes on the heels of the well-documented supply challenges of 2021. Record-high fertilizer prices, trade disputes resulting in tariffs, supply disruptions because of various reasons and higher manufacturing costs for fertilizer producers all came together to push nutrient prices significantly higher in 2021.

The hope for relatively calm waters in the fertilizer industry in 2022 may be fading as the world waits to see if Russia invades Ukraine.

Samuel Taylor, RaboResearch farm inputs analyst, told DTN the conflict between Russia and Ukraine really has not had much of an effect on global fertilizer markets yet. For the North American market, this time of year is a seasonally slower time for fertilizer buying, so there have not been many signs of a nervous market, he said.

Obviously, a military conflict would have a huge negative effect on both global nutrient supply and price, he said. Many fertilizer analysts were calling for lower fertilizer prices in the second half of 2022.

DTN wrote a Global Fertilizer Outlook series in December 2021, and in the potash outlook, this particular subject was discussed (https://www.dtnpf.com/…).


With fewer market disruptions and even more nutrient supplies in 2022, fertilizer prices in the world market were actually on the decline. Nitrogen in several different forms was seeing lower world prices, Taylor said.

Chris Lawson, head of fertilizers for business consulting firm CRU, said the global urea market has dropped sharply in recent weeks.

Urea FOB (free on board) NOLA (New Orleans, Louisiana) ended 2021 at $765 per short ton. Last week, the price was only $578/short ton, he said.

"So, it will be interesting to see if those prices bound back this week over these concerns to Russian supply," Lawson said.

Russia is a major player in the fertilizer industry, producing nitrogen, phosphorus and potash, according to Lawson. Russia exports almost 50% of its fertilizer-grade ammonium nitrate, with most of this fertilizer ending up in Europe.

This opens Europe to possible fertilizer shortages and price spikes if a conflict would happen, he said. The continent also depends on Russia for about a third of its natural gas supplies.

Phosphorous and potash prices have also not reacted much to this latest world geopolitical issue, Lawson said.


Taylor said if Russia invades Ukraine, most likely it would incur a whole host of sanctions from other countries. These measures could affect many industries.

"These sanctions sometimes specially target different industries within that country," Taylor said. "Whether or not possible Russian sanctions would include fertilizer is, of course, not known yet."

For a guide to what might happen to the Russian fertilizer industry under sanctions, examine what happened to another Black Sea region major fertilizer producer. Belarus, a leading producer of potash, saw sanctions in 2021.

In June 2021, the European Union (EU) imposed sanctions on Belarus because of an EU/Belarus border dispute. The U.S. issued their sanctions in December of 2021.

The EU sanctions were imposed on several different industries, including oil, tobacco and potash (file:///…).

Belarus is the third-largest producer of potash in the world, with just under 12 million metric tons (mmt) produced in 2019. The country accounts for 18% of the global potash production.

In addition, Belarus was the second-largest potash exporter in 2019, delivering 10.3 mmt of potash to overseas market. This is about 21% of the global trade.


Lawson said Lithuania's government has terminated the transport contract with Belarusian potash producer Belaruskali, effective Feb. 1. This leaves the company without a freight carrier to move volumes from its biggest export terminal.

CRU estimates the Lithuanian port handled around 92% of the company's exports in 2020, equivalent to 10.8 mmt.

In addition, Yara will stop its purchases from Belarus because of the sanctions imposed on the nation. This is expected to take place by April 1, he said.

"We don't expect cessation of exports from Belarus; it should be able to continue moving product through other ports," Lawson said. "But these sanctions will nevertheless severely hamper global potash supply."

Taylor said the supply chain for potash should adjust somewhat, and other potash producers should be able to fill in the gap.

Canada, which is also a large potash producer, would have to supply more into the world market if Belarus and possible Russian potash producers are hampered due to sanctions, he said.

Russ Quinn can be reached at russ.quinn@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @RussQuinnDTN

blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, January 28, 2022 11:35AM CST
Friday, January 28, 2022 11:35AM CST
Friday, January 28, 2022 11:35AM CST
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, January 24, 2022 8:26AM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:35PM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:35PM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, January 27, 2022 12:55PM CST
Thursday, January 27, 2022 12:55PM CST
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:47AM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Thursday, January 27, 2022 8:02PM CST
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 3:28PM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 11:01AM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Monday, January 24, 2022 12:35PM CST
Saturday, January 1, 2022 4:50AM CST
Saturday, January 1, 2022 4:50AM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Thursday, January 27, 2022 1:25PM CST
Thursday, January 27, 2022 1:25PM CST
Thursday, January 27, 2022 1:24PM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, January 28, 2022 3:03PM CST
Friday, January 28, 2022 3:03PM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 4:50PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, January 24, 2022 1:53PM CST
Monday, January 10, 2022 2:54PM CST
Monday, January 3, 2022 2:54PM CST
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Thursday, January 27, 2022 2:40PM CST
Thursday, January 27, 2022 2:40PM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 12:44PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:16PM CST
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:16PM CST
Monday, January 10, 2022 12:38PM CST
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:10AM CST
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:10AM CST
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:00AM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Friday, January 28, 2022 12:27PM CST
Friday, January 28, 2022 12:27PM CST
Thursday, January 27, 2022 4:02PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Friday, December 31, 2021 3:33PM CST
Friday, November 19, 2021 4:02PM CST
Friday, November 5, 2021 4:55PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN